WW: “Awake, Thou That Sleepest’

‘Awake, Though That Sleepest’
Sermon 3 – 1742

CONTEXT:

This sermon may have been inspired  by Fr. John Wesley; however, it was preached by none other than his brother Charles Wesley at Oxford on April 4th, 1742. It is indeed worth noting that the first three of the standard 52 sermons have been preached at the University of Oxford. Each sermon had a polemical tone and were railing against the lapsed Christianity of Wesley’s day. Charles’s message does not disappoint for it was Charles’ evangelical statement and his personal identification with the Revival.

CONTENT:

The sermon of Charles revolves around Ephesians 5:14

Awake, thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light.

The three major points of Charles’ message was:

  • Describe the sleepers to whom they speak
  • Enforce the statement of “Awake thou that sleepiest, and arise from the dead’
  • Explain the promise made to such as do awake and arise: ‘Christ shall give his light’

It indeed takes a skillful writer to speak with clarity in the midst of endless questions. Reading this sermon was like drinking from a fire hose to the constant questioning of the fire fighter, “Did you get that.”

Wesley speaks first of what he means by sleepers, “By sleep is signified the natural state of man: that deep sleep of the soul into which the sin of Adam hat sat all who spring from his lions… wherein every man comes into the world, and continues till the voice of God awakens him.” This is not just a state of the heathen, but also the “Laodicean Christian’, neither cold nor hot, but a quite rational, inoffensive, good-natured professor of the religion of his fathers.

You can even pick up echoes from the Second Sermon, “Almost Christian” with the reference to he ‘who having a form of godliness, denies the power thereof’,

He ‘fasts twice in the week’, uses all the means of grace, is constant at church and sacrament; yea, and ‘gives tithes of all that he has’, does all the good that he can. ‘touching the righteousness of the law’, he is ‘blameless’: he wants nothing of gladness but the power; nothing of religion but the spirit; nothing of Christianity but the truth and the life.

Wesley concludes that without the Spirit of Christ, we are dead and sons of the devil!

The right response to the “awake, awake” of God is “what must i do to be saved”? Wesley draws out many examples of the dire situation we find ourselves, “The night is far spent, the morning is at hand when thou art to be brought forth to execution. And in these dreadful circumstances thou art fast asleep; thou art fast asleep in the devil’s arms , on the brink of the pit, in the jaws of everlasting destruction.”

“In what state is thy soul?”, “Hast thou oil in thy lamp?”, “Art thou ‘partaker of the divine nature’?”… the questions of Wesley drives his rhetoric forward, calling out to his audience to “arise from the dead”. Wesley finally explains the promise, ‘Christ shall give thee light.’ Even in this final section, Wesley pleads with his audience to hear the Lord’s cry to awake, “O God, ‘in the midst of wrath remember mercy’! Be glorified in our reformation, not in our destruction.”

COMMENTARY:

Not all the dead who walk the earth will arise.

Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and eat with him, and he with me. ~Rev. 3:20~

WW: “The Almost Christian”

“The Almost Christian”

 ”Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian.
Acts 26:28

CONTEXT:

As I wrote this article, I was flying a little above 36,000 feet right now on my way to the Anglican Mission’s Winter Conference. That being the case, I only had the Wesley sermons from my Accordance Bible Software to keep me company during this flight and not the massive volumes of Scripture Notes, Letters, and Journals that I would love to refer to for a more comprehensive context.

I still have available to me some very helpful notes from Albert Outler that pertain to the context of this sermon. The context of the first sermon, “Salvation by Faith” was delivered in the context of a post “heart-warming” experience at Aldersgate, but “The Almost Christian” (another one preached at Oxford) comes in the midst of the Revival and the exponential growth of Wesley’s Societies. Wesley’s hermeneutic of Acts 26:28 is also noted by Outler as being “a familiar one in Puritan preaching. It was, indeed, already conventional to shift from the text’s plain reference (Agrippa’s being almost persuaded to become a Christian) to a discussion of nominal Christianity.”

It is also highly recommended to read Wesley’s later sermon, “The More Excellent Way” (1787) in dialog with “The Almost Christian.” While there is no change in Wesley’s soteriology, the hard-line between the “almost” and “altogether” Christian becomes more gentle and the emphasis given for both orders of Christian to pursue the “telos” of being in Christ, ‘the more excellent way’ of a pure love of God and a humble ‘love of all men for God’s sake.’” Context matters with both sermons since “Almost Christian” is a  polemical sermon delivered to an Oxford audience, whereas “The More Excellent Way” appears to be more pastoral (yet less highly regarded).

CONTENT SUMMARY:

Wesley begins by outlining a concept that manifests itself in every age and culture: nominal Christianity. We hear this in those plagued words of Herod, ‘almost thou has persuadeth me to be a Christian.’ Wesley, therefore, draws a hard-line between what he designates as the “almost” and the “altogether” Christian.

The “almost Christians” are characterized by a couple of distinctive features:

  •  They are culturally moral people: they abide by the standards of morality. Doing things like telling the truth, caring for the poor, doing things in moderation, etc.
  •  They are outwardly Christians: they do nothing that the Gospel forbids. No excessive drinking, gluttony, no scoffing, gossiping, etc.
  • They faithfully attend worship services: they participate in the sacramental life whenever they can and even practice privately the spiritual disciplines of prayer and fasting.
  • They are properly motivated by a desire to serve God and do his will: the almost Christian isn’t a hypocrite, but genuinely is motivated by an inward desire to be faithful to God.

But what more than all this to be an “altogether Christian”?

Wesley outlines three main “paradigm shifts”:

  • The Love of God: A complete in-filling in heart and deed of the holy love of God. The entire capacity of our soul, the whole heart, all our affections, and the complete extent of all our faculties should be permeated by this love. That God would dwell in us and us in God.
  • The Love of Neighbor: This to Wesley means every man, woman, child, and enemy. That the love in us creates a humanizing energy to see the remnant imago dei in each human person.
  • Born of God: Wesley then moves into the reality that ‘To as many as received him gave he power to become the sons of God.’ That this familial relationship with God comes by the right living kind of faith (echoing sermon #1 “salvation by faith” a few years earlier), a faith that brings forth repentance, love, and all good works… this is also tied to believing more than just in the creeds, the Holy Scriptures,  BUT ALSO to have a “sure trust and confidence to be saved from everlasting damnation by Christ”

COMMENTARY:

When I initially wrote this short article, I felt a lot like Wesley must have felt like with the Moravians on his turbulant voyage back from America… there was constant turbulence on my flight to Houston and it wasn’t a “comfortable flight.” In this context, I read Almost Christian.

As I sat in my plane seat and attempted to not only digest the substance of Wesley’s sermon, I also pondered the  “almost” / “altogether” dichotomy presented by Wesley in this sermon and how it applies to the landscape of American Christianity today. The hallmark of modern evangelicalism (and fundamentalism) is an unwavering assent in word (at its best in deed as well) to the tenants of Wesley’s “Altogether Christians” (but seriously, how many times does the ‘Greatest Commandment’  get abducted into become nothing more than a pithy church slogan/mission statement/marketing mechanism… of “love God – love neighbor”).

In word we say it’s about the Great Commission, the Greatest Commandment, and “being born again”, but in praxis (practice) we are not only “almost Christians’, but “half-ass Christians”… Our church programs, worship services, discipleship, and agendas have deteriorated into the state of become nothing more than a production line for taking “half-ass Christians” and turning them (at best) into what Wesley identifies as “almost Christians.” (read Willow Creek’s book on their megachurch Reveal). How many people even attempt (let alone attain to) the personal piety that Wesley and the “Oxford Holy Club” had:

“Using diligence to eschew all evil, and to have a conscience void of offence; redeeming the time, buying up every opportunity of doing all good to all men; constantly and carefully using all the public and all the private means of Grace, endeavoring after a steady seriousness of behavior at all time sand in all place… And God is my record, before whom I stand, doing all this in sincerity; having a real design to serve God….”

This is Reverend John Wesley speaking… ordained in the Church of England as a Presbyter, a missionary to the end of the world, Georgia, a faithful observer of daily prayer offices, a diligent student of the Bible, a preacher, and the ‘founder’ of Methodism… And yet Wesley says,

“My own conscience beareth me witness in the Holy Ghost that all this time I was but ‘almost a Christian.”

We motivate those whom we Shepherd to study the Bible, go to adult education electives, go on short-term missionary trips, perhaps go to Seminary and get ordained, pray more often, come to this conference, listen to this music, get more involved in ‘church activities’ … this isn’t necessarily ‘bad’, but without the right Spirit behind it we are merely making “almost Christian” disciples …

I submit that as leaders we need to have a “taste and see” or “follow me as I follow Jesus” … An orthopraxis to match the orthodoxy of Wesley’s “altogether christian.”  We must ourselves encounter the risen Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit in such a way that we are forever changed, marked, adopted as sons and daughters… A paradigm shift must occur from mentally (or emotionally) assenting to propositional truths about Jesus to ontologically being seen/known/rooted in Christ, “being hid in Christ.”

A paradigm shift must also occur in ecclesiology… we must go from seeing “the church as an institution with sacraments” to “a sacrament with institutions.” It is one of the scourges of our age that in order to attract religious consumers, leaders in the church (and wolves) use clumsy sayings like, “its about Jesus not the church” “or I love Jesus but hate the church.”… As I heard it described, “moralistic therapeutic deism“… This may scratch the ears of the consumers of spiritual fads (and sell some books), but it is not in line with ecclesiology according to the Scriptures, creeds, church fathers, and millennia of the church being the “body of Christ.”

I tend to agree more with the tone of Wesley in his much later sermon, “The More Excellent Way.” Perhaps “nominal” or “cultural” Christian is a title more befitting the qualities that Wesley lays out here instead of “almost Christians.”

It’s sermons like this that do convict me in some strange way. They challenge the core of my desire, the inner cry of my soul, the motive behind my movements, so I conclude with this prayer (it should sound familiar if you read the sermon or St. Paul):

“May we all thus experience what it is to be not almost only, but altogether Christians! Being justified feely by his grace, through the redemption that is in Jesus, knowing we have peace with God through Jesus Christ, rejoicing in the hope of the glory of God, and having the lover of God shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost given unto us.”

Written in conjunction with the Wesley 52 Project.

WW: “Salvation by Faith”

Salvation By Faith

“By grace ye are saved through faith.”
- Ephesians 2:8 -

CONTEXT:

Weds, May 24th, 1738:

In my return to England, January, 1738, being in imment danger of death, and very uneasy on that account I was strongly convinced that the cause of that uneasiness was unbelief; and that the gaining a true, living faith was the “one thing needful” for me. But still I fixed not this faith on it’s right object: I meant only faith in God, not faith in or through Christ. Again, I knew not that I was wholly ovid of this faith; but only though, I had not enough of it…

In the evening I went very unwillingly to a society in Aldersgate-Street, where one was reading Luther’s preface to the Epistle to the Romans. About a quarter before nine, while he was describing they change which God works in the heart through faith in Christ, I felt my heart strangely wormed. I felt I did trust in Christ, Christ alone for salvation: And an assurance was given me, that he had taken away my sins, even mine, and saved me from the law of sin and death.

If you go and read John Wesley’s journal entries from the days between his “Aldersgate” experience above and the preaching of the sermon “Salvation by Faith” on the Festival of St. Barnabas, June 11 at the University of Oxford, you will find a man working out in his personal experience the substance of his proclamation from Ephesians 2:8, especially the themes of faith and salvation.

Albert Outler, also notes that the Moravian elements of the sermon are qualified by echoes from the Book of Homilies (as in the claim that salvation involved the power not to commit sin – see especially the homily “Salvation of Mankind“)

CONTENT

  1. The relationship between Grace and Faith - Wesley brilliantly begins by differentiating between “grace” and “faith”: “If then sinful man find favor with God, it is ‘grace upon grace’… ‘By Grace’, then, ‘are ye saved though faith.’Grace is the source, faith the condition, of salvation…. Now, that we fall not short of the grace of God, it concerns us carefully to inquire…” Wesley then goes on to inquire on the condition of faith and the scope of salvation.The subtlety of this beginning is profound. If you begin not with God’s grace as source, then you may stumble into the heresy that one’s faith is both the source and condition of salvation. This is the misinformed argument that I face amongst my Reformed brethren, “Is it your faith or what Jesus did that saved you.” The underlying question being, “does your faith independent of anything God does or doesn’t do bring about salvation?” Wesley, I believe would say no. It is only by God’s grace that ‘he loved us enough while we were yet sinners to send Jesus Christ  to die and save us.’  It is by grace through faith.
  2. The scandal of particular faith - Wesley doesn’t just say that all you need is any form or flavor of faith, but a faith of a particular genre, “It is faith in Christ – Christ, and God through Christ, are the proper object of it.” Furthermore, it is not just a faith of mental assent, “Confess with thy mouth and believe with thy heart that God hath raised him from the dead”If you look at the other categories of faith that Wesley uses in this sermon, “Faith of a heathen”, “Faith of a Devil”, “Faith of the pre-easter Apostles”, then you find in fact that truly ‘the road to destruction is wide and spacious, but the narrow gate leads to life, and few find it.” For Wesley, the linchpin of the faith by which one is saved is the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, not just mentally assented to, but an ingestion of truth whereby the reality of the Gospel becomes “bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh.”  I love the scope of Wesley’s definition of Christian Faith:”Christian faith is then not only an assent to the whole gospel of Christ, but also a full reliance on the blood of Christ, a trust in the merits of his life, death, and resurrection; a recumbency upon him as our atonement and our life, as given for us,and living in us.… It is a sure confidence which a man hath in God, that through the merits of Christ his sins are forgiven, and he reconciled to the favor of God; and in consequence hereof a closing with him and cleaving to him as our ‘wisdom, righteousness, sanctification, and redemption’ … or, in one word, our salvation.
  3. Scope of Salvation -For Wesley “salvation” wasn’t just a ‘get out of hell card’ or an ‘escape from the fallenness of creation’ or a ‘say this prayer and be saved’ genre of salvation. As the quote above illuminates, salvation is personal: it involves the second person of the Holy Trinity, Christ Jesus and it involves each one of us as people (in other words, “God has no grandchildren”, but sons and daughters through Christ).Salvation also is  ”presently powerful”: Salvation isn’t just something you wait for when you die, but can be experienced in this life. Forgiveness is linked with formation- our desires, actions, ‘modes of being’, are transformed to the likeness of Christ – even the guilt of sin is transformed in our salvation in Christ.
  4. Objections - What preacher you know today at the end of his or her sermon will say, “and now for some objections to preaching so and so.” Then to answer the objections with humility, sobriety, and grace.Objection 8 is particularly interesting to me because of Wesley’s distancing of his presentation of “salvation by Faith” against that of the church of Rome (a claim again that some theological camps wrongly make by ascribing Wesley’s teaching to a romish semi-pelagian heresy). He also says that this doctrine, “by grace through faith” is called by the Church of England to be the foundation of the Christian religion and the reason for “popery” being driven from the land. He even references Martin Luther in a very flattering way.

COMMENTS:

As an Anglican priest, theologically educated in the Wesleyan tradition, I am thankful the Reverend John Wesley. He is not only a gift to Methodism, to Wesleyanism, to later Anglicanism, but to entire Body of Christ. He is a saint that is truly worthy of his feast day (which in the Church of England consequentially falls on May 24th, but in the Episcopal Church USA on the 3rd of March).

When I read Wesley, I am always struck with how comprehensive his sermons are. He doesn’t just tell you to do this and do that, but advances a cogent argument, a well defined pathway that lets you wrestle through the layers of theological extremes that clutter and distract you from the road. Wesley is also someone who lived out his sermons. Part of my plan this year as I go through the 52 Standard Sermons is to also read through the journal entries before and after each sermon delivery date. I want to become better friends with John Wesley this year, and perhaps, this friendship will be a means of grace by which to I will grow in love and knowledge our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. This is my prayer for us all.

By: rmKocak
1/3/12

Written in conjunction with the Standard52 Project

The Wesley 52 Project

It begins on rmkocak.com tomorrow… and every Wednesday henceforth in 2012.

The first entry on the 52 standard sermons preached by Reverend John Wesley in the 18th century will be posted. It is part of a collaborative work between myself and friends from a variety of denominations, church positions, and geographic locations. Each week we read one of the 52 standard sermons and write a little something about it (you can find those sermons free online here). I will be posting both on our Wesley 52 site  (check this site out for a variety of views and insights) and each Wednesday on rmkocak.com.

Keep your eyes peeled for a post on Wesley’s sermon “Salvation by Faith” tomorrow morning.